XVI: Deity Meditation and the Life of the Spirit

Until we become the light, we are standing somewhere relative to it, and shadows are part of the deal. Moses had to hide in the crag of a rock while God's brilliance passed by. That gave the light direction, and it implied that much of what viewing God's glory does is "make shadow visible." We students of Rabbouni have borne the heat of the day. We've watched shadows move with the sun as our selves die. We've shaken hands with the noonday demon and, next to Christ, have breathed our last. It is enough for students to become like the teacher. [bxA]

Turning toward the light too soon causes blindness and distraction from shiny objects. Eve's shiny object was the fruit of the tree of knowledge. Eating it caused a whole history of distraction--it wasn't till Moses that humanity remembered that the breath of life had been God's name the whole time. Moses' shiny object was the burning bush. But to Moses, God said "come no closer...for the ground on which you stand is holy." Despite seeing the light, Moses would spend his life dealing with shadow. Indeed, shadow work might have been Moses calling all along: he so identified with Israel's thirst that he disobeyed God, striking the rock at Meribah and Massah twice. And for that he was denied the privilege of entering the promised land. Christ would allow himself to be accused for similarly unjustifiable reasons, and Saint Paul would famously muse about how "lack of fulfillment" seemed part and parcel of following Jesus in this life. Perhaps, when the divine radiance is behind us, when we've abandoned ego but can't seem to do so permanently--perhaps a time will come when our calling will come to light--as an obligation to notice the interplay between light and shadow in the first place.

Our friends in the Eastern Orthodox tradition were right--steeped in a tradition of Desert Solitaries, they spoke about our need to unearth the Divine Image within--they called the teaching "Divinization." The Christian West is familiar with perichoresis (the relation between the persons of the trinity in divine mystery) but very few of us have taught about internalizing the Trinity: it's a neglect in which we students of the Logos couldn't afford to persist. By and by, we could no longer afford the toll it took on our serenity.

The teacher said "the wind blows where it wills, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is for those who are born of the Spirit." The Logos showed us that beholding the Spirit within would involve ceasing to identify with the "you" who is doing the knowing. A tree was known by its fruit--and the Word had attuned us to how action, thought, and emotion came with different sensations. On the off-chance it might help, we abandoned the narrative of self, blame-ridden and rationalizing as it was. Our serenity increased, even as we were confronted with a great deal of darkness. Without the false protections of ego, the dark was no longer "other," but instead it was a part of us. To the extent that we hung in there, the character of the darkness changed. It went from foreboding to familiar.

We, who were (none of us) great saints, could empathize with them nonetheless. It's said that, psychologically, they did not experience themselves as becoming more perfect. Instead, their knowledge of their sins increased. They were able to bear it, though, because the God's light shone behind them. As we descended with our minds into our hearts, we laid aside the trappings of intellect and learned to flex the atrophied muscles of intuition. We found a whole new way of learning, characterized by realization instead of reason--and learned to live with the doubt that came before the "aha moment."

We stared into the darkness, full of terrible unknowns which seemed both sentient and morbidly preoccupied with desire and fulfillment, stimulus and response. On account of this apparent "battle of wills," the Desert Solitaries had sought out sparse environments, called what they struggled with demonic. Any monk will tell you that, in the end, hermits find themselves alone on a train platform full of people. We found ourselves similarly alone. But we couldn't shake the feeling that the different voices inside us were just repressed echoes of our own consciousness. We looked at our family histories, and saw a gathering of wounded voices. We learned they could change--we could become, for ourselves, the nurturing voice we always wanted to hear.

This became the foundation of Trinitarian Deity Meditation--a discipline at the center of Tantra. We would eventually find, within us, a voice whose only task is to become Christ--we would grow in ability to state our needs, echoing the thirst of the crucified Christ, without expectation of fulfillment. More importantly, Christ's tendency to "seek out the lost" became a way to avoid narcissism. Exploiting our divinity in garnering the adoration of others seemed fruitless. Idolatry takes a toll in the subtle anxiety it creates, and already our track record with bearing even life's mundane stresses was wretched. So we stuck with what was doable. We tried to become more aware of all that was inside us. We tried to coax the ear of our own hearts into hearing the Gospel that the Christ within us had been preaching the whole time. To ourselves, we preached Christ crucified--the Cross never seemed entirely finished with us, as we often found ourselves mentally fleeing from its agony. Somewhere along the line, we heard it said "suffering is pain you have yet to accept." As we grew in acceptance, pain increasingly struck us as "just another sensation"--one that, if we listened deeply, had teaching we needed. As Isaiah says, we "gave our backs to those who beat us" so that morning by morning we could "listen as one who is taught."

The Father began to show us all of the grasping at control and micro-judgement behind our opinions. The Teacher said "do not judge, lest you be judged" and "which of you, by worrying, can add a single hour to your life"--we heard him more clearly now, and longed to respond. Like Zacchaeus, we descended the tree of ego, taken concrete steps toward restitution. But the ways we'd come to grief were often too much for us, so we took refuge in the cross of Christ, reascending to be with the Father. On the cross we discovered the ability to reparent, reframe and recapitulate our self-imposed anguish: these were God-given skills central to turning our resentment into the quiet mind of Christ. On the cross we found compassion for the back-biting business of human life--the tendency to prattle on was in us, we knew, as much as in others. On the cross, remaining in suspension Christ began to remedy our desire for control. We had only to train our desire in daily remembrance. it was constant work, but it made our lives better. We were back in Exodus, where the Israelites learned the lesson Isaiah crystalized: "Listen to me, and eat what is good." Increasingly, manna was reality, and reality was manna.

We had, in the end, but a single complaint. Trinitarian Deity meditation was hard to sustain. We were aware, now, of the myriad times we ceased to be present to the workings of our minds and hearts--and where we failed at watchfulness, judgment flourished. Over the long haul, we became discouraged.  The dark side of community was everywhere: we increasingly saw our own transactionality ruin our relationships, even as others sought to take from us more than we had to give. We knew the way brokenness worked because we saw it in ourselves. What was said of the teacher was said of us: "he would not reveal himself to them, because he knew what was in them." With time, we grew more reserved. Eventually we knew the truth of it: light without shadows is possible, but even when the light is invisible, there would be no shadows without it.  

In Christian Tantra, opposites are relativized; the part of us dies that's weary of bearing what is, and so "what we will be" is, in a sense, what we have always been. The beginning and the end are one: so it is for those who are born of the Spirit. Ultimately we find that, when we were discouraged, we didn't give the Spirit enough credit. It was in inverted symbol that the Triune God showed itself to our ego-veiled eyes. Once we learned the lesson, we realized Christ had been present to us the whole time--he was just present in things we were averse to. We solitaries weren't huge fans of strangers, and yet Christ made himself present there. We were wounded ourselves, still learning self-care, and Christ made himself present in the sick. The Wisdom of Solomon spoke of "a prison not made of Iron"--and we knew immediately it was our ego--but it took a minute to teach ourselves to be comfortable visiting the imprisoned.

It's a poverty, to be certain. The words of life are the work of wisdom. We were too used to denial to be in the present moment without mentally checking out. But Christ turned our willfulness to willingness in the breaking of the bread. As we brought the Lord's offering of gently focused attention and intention, our hearts grew increasingly generous. We are like other people not in our gifts or uniqueness, but in our liabilities. For Israel, the passover was a remembrance, certainly of Exodus, but of all twelve tribes at all times. The Passover was the bread of the Exodus broken in the moment while fleeing the ego. It recalled, as well, the bread of the presence--which symbolized all 12 tribes as one community. We followers of Christ have fallen afoul of all 613 mitvot--and we're on the hook for every jot and tittle. But for God's love, we are a noisy gong, and an inverted symbol. As often as we work to remember, we can see all those who struggle to listen. Whether in the body or out of the body, we don't know, God knows. We're convinced the seven spirits of God shine inside us--and by their shadows, we will know them.

XV: Recapitulating the Ego in Christian Tantra

We Christian Tantrikas, as students of Rabbouni and disciples of the logos, are not asked to learn from miracles, but from normalcy. We don't have the fortitude to be Red Martyrs, whose blood is the seed of the Church. We don't have the temperance to be White Martyrs, as the ancient renunciants were who gave all they had and took the monastic habit. At our best, I suppose we could call ourselves "grey martyrs," but perhaps it's best to just be quiet. [bxA]

The Teacher destroyed the clingy causality of sin and death by submitting to it.  For him, acceptance of things as they are was the climate in which the Spirit arose within him.  Knowing that self is a good thing so long as we get rid of it at the right time, the teacher nurtured self in order to give it up, in order to avoid being the dog that returned to his vomit.  He'd spent his life denying his attractions and encountering his aversions, but doing so without weaving a new identity out of it.  Further, he'd developed the "Father voice" that rang through his psychological makeup so deeply that, when it came time to hand all things over to his Father in death, he managed to bear the agony of it.  

This transformed anger, judgment and desire.  To deal quickly with the first two: anger lost its edge and became an insistence on getting rid of distractions, a tool for being in the moment.  This came out of Jesus' deep knowledge of his own distractibility.  Jesus knew the part of him that simply couldn't afford to grasp at shiny objects.  It's no surprise that later, he would talk about longing to run every which way after the lord, but learning to sit with it, until his day is like lightning from one end of the sky to the other. Judgment became, for Jesus, a tool for becoming attuned to the Spirit within.  He learned to discern the promptings of the truth while distinguishing between one sensation and another, one emotion and another, one thought and another.  Later, out of his own knowledge of the fruits of different kinds of thinking, he would say "if you call your brother a fool, you will be liable to the lake of fire."

We have no doubt that Jesus' own desires were purified--after all, he entirely ceased to manipulate to get his needs met, and was able, on the cross, to simply say "I thirst." But here, as a testament to how the Word has transformed us, instead of assuming we've measured the teacher's insights correctly, we wish to offer our own journey with desire. We knew that we usually only wanted things that were pleasant to us. We only wanted things that accorded with the system of expectations our minds had set up. Desire struck us as a terrific source of constant suffering because, well, we were making it that way. We could confirm this by the emotional tailspins that denial of desire and unmet expectations cause us. Then one day it struck us that we were going about it wrong. It struck us that desire was given us so that we could become devoted to things as they are.  In other words, God says he'll use absolutely everything to guide us, and some of that won't be pleasant. God will teach through our aversions as much as through our attractions, and we will need a way to pay attention to both. Desire, it seemed, was our means of absorbing all of the lessons. The more we trained desire on acceptance of all things, without exception, the more desire itself became both a tool we could willingly both pick up and put down, as well as a gutsy form of prayer. Relating to desire in this way made us understand that a vow is performative language, and that most of the time, fulfilling that vow would involve dispensing with words in preference of listening.

Jesus surrendered his self concept. He did not count equality with God as something to be grasped, but emptied himself. He found willingness by abandoning willfulness.  He ceased to cling to an identity formed by the desire for control.  His language for this was paternal: he was "handing all things over to the Father." In Gethsemani, the teacher said "if this cup cannot pass unless I drink it, thy will be done." We theorize that, for Jesus, "doing the Father's will" was a way Jesus had conscious psychological access to what his faith told him was always (philosophers would say "ontologically") true. There was a way in which "the Father and I are one" was the deepest truth of Christ's life, whatever might be happening psychologically--we students of Rabbouni make bold to think that this is true, not just of Christ, but of all people. The mechanics of that truth are for theologians to work out--we need only remain focused on being with Jesus by his own measure. In other words, it's only when we refuse to look up to heaven, but stand in the back of our places of prayer saying "Lord have mercy on us, sinners" that we will know what it means that "everyone, without exception, is the Trinity enfleshed."

We desire to do what Jesus did. Looking within, we see that our family relationships are full of conflict. We were fed up with that stored trauma making wreckage of our adult choices, so we began to work with it. We became, to ourselves, the kinds of parents we had always needed. When we realized that there was no loss that couldn't be reconciled, it allowed us the safety to become healthy adults, always engaged in the work of nurturing the wounded parts of ourselves.  This psychological reparenting and reframing became the foundation of two aspects of Christian Tantra. We claim that every Christian has a share in the way Christ recapitulated all creation: in doing this work, we'll see vices turn to virtues. We claim that every Christian has a desperate need to turn their ears away from ego and superego, listening instead to the higher, humble self that is Christ within, constantly handing all things over to the father. This isn't a badge of honor, it's a tool supplied by wisdom. It's accessible to all, and if it's used at all, it's to be used in the service of the weak, and never for the garnering of personal adoration. Those who have it never admit to it. Instead they keep their sight on the one Christ said was "destined to be lost"--that is, on their own egos. And they pay attention to the teacher when he says, of the self, "if it is my will that he tarry until I return, what is that to you?" If you can hear this, we have this work in common: to follow Christ, without thought of the destination and regardless of objectives.

Remember, says the Logos, the words of the Teacher: "There were many lepers in Israel at the time of Elisha the Prophet, but not one was cleansed except Namaan the Syrian." Elisha bucked Namaan's expectations of how healing would happen. The great warrior thought Elisha would come and wave his hand over him and speak words of healing for all to hear. Instead Elisha refuses to meet with him, tells him to wash in the Jordan River seven times. Elisha bucked Namaan's system of attraction and aversion. The soldier, (who'd conquered many lands,) claims to know a great many rivers more grand than the Jordan. But Elisha asks him to immerse himself in the Jordan nonetheless. 

Our logical minds represent, often by inverted symbol, the ineffable things humility beholds clearly. In silence we hear the Lord asking "Can you drink the cup of which I am to drink." Undoubtedly, our desire for a spot at Christ's side--for the pleasant bits of being with Christ-- will lead us to say "yes." This is why Christ says "It's the Father's job, not mine, to hand out spots at my left and my right." Jesus is alerting us that a hard teaching is coming: he's going to use our aversions to teach, as he once used our attractions. We're asked if we can bear a share of the worlds sinfulness that's more than we deserve to bear. As soon as we say yes, Jesus asks "what if enduring the sins of the world and being asked to take on too much at work are the same?" We're asked if we're willing to descend into hell with Christ. No sooner do we agree, than we're told that bearing with gossips at work (to purify our own opinionatedness)--this is what descending with Christ will look like. We're asked if we are willing to bear other people's purgatorial debt on their behalf. Full of our glorious self-righteousness, we agree. And we're immediately asked "what if assuming the debt of others and allowing the routine dependency of those we love are the same?" We have heard it said, "if you have not been faithful with what belongs to another, who will give you what is your own." But Christ says to us "If we can't process the scandal inherent in the growth of our own humility, what inner resources will help us to perform greater works?" If God uses what is low and despised in the world--things that are not--to bring to nothing things that are, isn't it time we stop trying to pretend to be good when our ability to just be is critically impaired? We can formulate no response here, and it bows our heads.

We wash in the rivers of mundane daily tasks. We're given not seven cracks at it, either, but seventy times seven of them. If others, or if even our own egos feel the need to call us martyrs of any shade--God willing we'll, have the grace to wax nonsensical, to fry the brains both of others or ourselves. Followers of the buddha, when asked "what is budda" would spontaneously tie their sandals on their heads and exit the room. We followers of Jesus would be lucky to be so humble. At the least, our job is to listen. "When you have finished all that was asked of you" said the teacher "say "we are worthless servants, for we have done nothing more than what was asked of us." Then, when the quiet asks "who do you say that you are" may we only answer as silently as we were asked.