St. John says “the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
Because koans unite opposites in the here and now, I know how I would handle
half of this. But the other half of this Koan is overt about what it involves:
namely what the Christian West calls “Divinization.” My initial impulse is to see this as a
dissolving of egoic boundaries into God.
But this old foundation begins to crumble from the start.
Jerusalem’s temple is a good image for my sense of self. Post exile, the Jews returned to find
temple destroyed and society in ruins. Similarly, given the baggage I bring to spiritual efforts, I feel destroyed from the start. Just as the jews hoped return to the
Promised Land would induce calm or offer real prospects for rest, I hoped the
same thing about spiritual life. Were my
ego the temple, I’d still be jockeying between working too hard to rebuild the
house, and avoiding it altogether. I
haven’t found a consistent space of presence, that listens to God’s Law with
renewed placidity, even with hammer in hand.

Granted, the level of the ego is dualistic from the get-go. But my false self is damaged, unable
to do even the things for which a healthy defense mechanism is designed. Adult Children of Alcoholics would
say I have an externally referenced sense of self. I’m prone to addiction, and too
hooked on drama. In terms of
Koanic work, when the ego is damaged to begin with, I don’t know how to handle
the collapse into oneness that Divinization requires.
One of my two best friends is a jewish bloke with years of Buddhist
practice. We met in the monastery, at a
time when we were both discovering deep spiritual wounds, as well as a shared
ambivalence about redemption. He was the one to name it: we both needed
a redeemer. But at the time, I was
facing the reality of my own codependence, imbibing a 12-step tradition that
said things like “God won’t do for you what you are unwilling to do for
yourself” and again “you alone can do it, but you cannot do it alone.” I was as apt to isolate and overwork
as I was to be needy and pass the buck.
Neither are a fabulous way to treat prospective messiahs.
My friend was ambivalent for his own reasons. He felt the pressure all Jews feel, to
explain why he didn’t—nay, couldn’t—believe in Jesus. Religiously, he had only ever been
superficially Jewish, but culturally, he knew that conversion to Christianity
would be too deep a betrayal. For a
while he dabbled uncomfortably in Chabad Judaism—it emphasized the performance
of mitzvahs—and empathized with the messianic longings of the Hasidim, but he’d
formally committed to neither.
In short, we both felt the survivor’s guilt of our brokenness. Pulled between responsibility and dependence,
we needed what the messiah’s redemptive death offered, yet it conflicted with
the call to become what we needed, a call that echoed in the teaching “if you
find the Buddha, kill him.” I can’t speak for my friend, but over the
years I’ve discovered what for me, is the source of the tension.
Both Contemplative Christianity and Zen have a caricature of prayer
practice: in both, the goal is to get “beyond” or “go deeper than” the pain of
our lives so as to be blessed by an amorphous ultimate reality beneath or
beyond everything. That
caricature comes from a spiritualized, egoic program for enlightenment in which
God is wholly “other,” the events of our lives are the American Ninja Warrior
course we navigate to get to him, and the redeemer is the drug we take to
achieve the finish line despite our own deficiencies.
Such a vision is not what prayer or
redemption are about.

“The Word was with God, and the Word was God.” When this post began, I was focused on the
union between God and man. I temporarily forgot that a Koan unites
opposites. My wounds are precisely the
places I feel least like the God I need to become. But I’ve cause to hope those are precisely
the cramped and confused spaces where my redemption is actualized. If, as saint Paul says, my true self is
“hidden with Christ in God” then the mechanics of egoic collapse include
admitting I’m not God and being utterly confused about who I am. While The “Aha” moments might provide exile
with a leaven I understandably crave, ultimately the “here we go again” moments
are the places where God makes real return to myself possible.
The book of Ezra says:
The book of Ezra says:
When the builders laid the foundation of the temple of the Lord, all the people responded with a great shout when they praised the Lord... But many of the priests and Levites and heads of families, old people who had seen the first house on its foundations, wept with a loud voice when they saw this house, though many shouted aloud for joy, so that the people could not distinguish the sound of the joyful shout from the sound of the people’s weeping.
In your hearing and mine, in the here and the now, this scripture is fulfilled.
No comments:
Post a Comment